NSEGeneral Updates3d ago · 27 Aug 2026, 03:56 pm
General Updates
Sumit Woods Limited · SUMIT
✦ AI Summary▼ NegativeRegulatory
Sumit Woods Limited has received a disapproval notice from the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) under Section 346 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act for the redevelopment of the Makwana Building CHSL in Vile Parle East, Mumbai. The disapproval is due to various conditions not being met, including the absence of a commencement certificate, non-compliance with building codes, and failure to obtain necessary clearances.
Analysis Scores
Earnings Impact2/10
Growth Catalyst1/10
Governance Concern1/10
Regulatory Risk8/10
Balance Sheet Risk1/10
Liquidity Impact5/10
Market Sentiment2/10
✦ Ask a Question
Ask anything about this announcement — AI will answer based on the filing content.
Full Announcement
Sumit Woods Limited has informed the Exchange about General Updates
Attachments (1)
📄pdf
Download →
SUMIT_27082026155558_NSE.pdf
View document text
in replying please quote No.
Form ------------
and date of this letter.
BRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
Intimation of Disapproval under Section 346 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, as
amended up to date.
No. P-25994/2025/(260)/K/E WARD/FP/IOD/1/NEW Dated- 27 August
2026
Municipal Office,
MEMORANDUM
Mumbai
Mr. Yash Shah partner of Sumit Luxe Venture LLP, CA to Makwana Building CHS Ltd.
B 1101 EXPRESS ZONE WESTERN EXPRESS HIGHWAY MALAD EAST MUMBAI 400097
With reference to your Notice 337 (New) , letter No. 0 dated. 28/4/2025 and the plans, Sections
Specifications and description and further particulars and details of your buildings at Proposed
redevelopment of residential building locally known as Makwana Building CHSL pherozeshah mehta road
on plot bearing
FP no 260 of TPS Vile parle No V Vile Parle East Mumbai.260 furnished to me under your letter, dated
28/4/2025. I have to inform you that, I cannot approve of the building or work proposed to be erected
or executed, and I therefore hereby formally intimate to you, under Section 346 of the Mumbai Municipal
Corporation Act as amended up to-date, my disapproval by reasons thereof :-
A: CONDITIONS TO BE COMPLIED WITH BEFORE STARTING THE WORK.
1 That the commencement certificate under section 44/69 (1)(a) of the M.R.T.P. Act will not be obtained
before starting the proposed work.
2 That the compound wall is not constructed on all sides of the plot clear of the road widening line with
foundation below level of bottom of road side drain without obstructing the flow of rain water from the
adjoining holding to prove possession of holding as per D.C. Regulation No.38(27) before starting the
work.
3 That the low lying plot will not be filled upto a reduced level of atleast 28.04 mtr. T.H.D. or 0.15 mtr.
above adjoining road level whichever is higher with murum, earth, boulders etc. and will not be
levelled, rolled and consolidated and sloped towards road side, before starting the work
4 That the structural design and calculations for the proposed work and for existing building showing
adequacy thereof to take up the additional load shall not be submitted before C.C
5 That the regular / sanctioned / proposed lines marking will not be got demarcated at site through A.E.
[Survey] / E.E. [T&C] / before applying for C.C
Page 1 of 14On 27-Aug-2026
No. P-25994/2025/(260)/K/E WARD/FP/IOD/1/NEW Dated- 27 August
2026
6 That the sanitary arrangement shall not be carried out as per Municipal specifications and drainage
layout will not be submitted before C.C
7 That the Indemnity Bond indemnifying the Corporation for damages, risks, accidents etc. and to the
occupiers and an undertaking regarding no nuisance will not be submitted before C.C./starting the
work.
8 That the requirements of N.O.C. of (i) Reliance Energy /Tata Power, [ii] S.G. [iii] P.C.O., [iv] A.A. & C.
[K/East Ward], [v] S.P. [vi] S.W.D. [vii] H.E. will not be obtained and the requisitions if any will not be
complied with before occupation certificate
9 That the qualified/registered site supervisor through architect/structural Engineer will not be appointed
before applying for C.C.
10 That “All Dues Clearance Certificate” related to H.E.’s dept. from the concerned A.E.W.W. [K/East Ward]
shall not be submitted before applying for C.C
11 That the development charges as per M.R.T.P. (amendment) Act 1992 will not be paid.
12 That the registered undertaking in prescribed proforma agreeing to demolish the excess area if
constructed beyond permissible FSI shall not be submitted before asking for C.C.
13 That the requisite premium as intimated will not be paid before applying for C.C
14 That the registered undertaking shall not be submitted for payment of difference in premium paid and
calculated as per revised land rates
15 That the C.C. shall not be asked unless payment of advance for providing treatment at construction
site to prevent epidemics like Dengue, Malaria, etc. is made to the Insecticide Officer of the concerned
Ward Office and provision shall be made as and when required by the Insecticide Officer for inspection
of water tanks by providing safe but stable ladder, etc. and requirements as communicated by the
Insecticide Office shall not be complied with.
16 That the Janata Insurance Policy in the name of site or policy to cover the compensation claims arising
out of workman's compensation Act 1923 will not be taken out before starting the work and also will
not be renewed during the construction work
17 That the building will not be designed with the requirements of all relevant IS codes including IS code
1893 for earthquake design while granting occupation certificate from Structural Engineer to that effect
will be insisted.
18 That no main beam in R.C.C. framed structure shall not be less than 230 mm. wide. The size of the
columns shall also not be governed as per the applicable I.S. Codes.
19 That all the cantilevers [projections] shall not be designed for five times the load as per I.S. code
1893-2002. This also includes the columns projecting beyond the terrace and carrying the overhead
water storage tank, etc.
20 That the R.C.C. framed structures, the external walls shall be less than 230 mm, if in brick masonary
or 150 mm autoclaved cellular concrete block excluding plaster thickness as circulated under
No.CE/5591 of 15.4.1974.
21 That the Vermiculture bins for disposal of wet waste as per the design and specification of
Organisations/individuals specialized in this field, as per the list furnished by Solid Waste Management
Department of M.C.G.M. shall not be provided to the satisfaction of Municipal Commissioner.or
Page 2 of 14On 27-Aug-2026
No. P-25994/2025/(260)/K/E WARD/FP/IOD/1/NEW Dated- 27 August
2026
alternative arrangement for in site treatment wet waste shall be not be made.
22 That the registered undertaking for water proofing of terrace and Nahani traps shall not be submitted.
23 That the N.O.C. from E.E.[T&C]/ Consultant remarks for parking layout in the stilt shall not be
submitted.
24 That setback/D.P. Road/D.P. Reservation shall not be handed over to BMC
25 That the Indemnity Bond for compliance of I.O.D. conditions shall not be submitted
26 That the design for Rain Water Harvesting System from Consultant as per Govt. notification under
Sec.37[2] of MR&T.P. Act, 1966 under No.TPB-4307/396/CR-24/2007/UD-11 dt.6/6/2007 shall not be
submitted.
27 That the debris removal deposit of Rs. 45,000/- or Rs. 02/- per sq.mtr. of the built up area, whichever
is less will not be paid before further C.C.
28 That the ‘Debris Management Plan’ shall not be got approved from Executive Engineer [Env.] and the
conditions therein shall not be complied with
29 That the labour welfare tax as per circular No. Dy.Ch.Eng/3663/BP (City) Dt. 30.9.2011 shall not be
paid before asking for C.C.
30 The developer shall not submit the registered undertaking agreeing to comply with & follow all the
rules, regulations, circulars, directives related to the safety of construction labors/workers, issued time
to time by the department of building & other construction labours, Government of Maharashtra.
31 That the developer will not intimate the prospective buyer and existing occupants regarding
concessions availed for deficiency in open space, deficient parking space, etc. as well as not objecting
neighbourhood development with deficient open spaces etc. and the clause shall not be incorporated in
sale agreement so as to make aware prospective buyer/ members about deficient open
space/maneouvering spaces
32 That the R.U.T. shall not be submitted by the developer stating that they will not take any objection in
future for the development on adjoining plot with deficient open spaces and also condition will be
incorporated about deficient open spaces of proposed bldg. in the sale agreement.
33 That the Registered Undertaking stating that the conditions of E.E. (T & C) NOC shall not be complied
with and to that effect the mechanized parking equipped with safe
[Showing first 8,000 characters — download PDF for full document]