NSEPendency of Litigation(s)/dispute(s) or the outcome impacting the Company1d ago · 19 Aug 2026, 12:04 pm
Pendency of Litigation(s)/dispute(s) or the outcome impacting the Company
Indegene Limited · INDGN
✦ AI SummaryLitigation
Indegene Limited has informed the Exchange about the pendency of litigation involving its wholly-owned subsidiary, Indegene, Inc., in the U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey. The lawsuit relates to alleged violations of the U.S. Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 1991. The parties have concluded negotiations on the definitive settlement agreement, subject to execution by the relevant parties and approval of the U.S. District Court.
Analysis Scores
Earnings Impact5/10
Growth Catalyst2/10
Governance Concern3/10
Regulatory Risk6/10
Balance Sheet Risk4/10
Liquidity Impact7/10
Market Sentiment5/10
✦ Ask a Question
Ask anything about this announcement — AI will answer based on the filing content.
Full Announcement
Indegene Limited has informed the Exchange about Pendency of Litigation(s)/dispute(s) or the outcome impacting the Company
Attachments (1)
📄pdf
Download →
INDEGENE_19082026120331_tofilelitigationSEDisclosure.pdf
View document text
INDGN/SE/2026-27/48
19 August 2026
BSE Limited, National Stock Exchange of India Limited
Phiroze Jeejeebhoy Towers, Exchange Plaza, C-1, Block G,
Dalal Street, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (E),
Mumbai- 400001, India. Mumbai – 400 051, India.
Scrip Code: 544172 Trading symbol: INDGN
Dear Sir / Madam,
Sub: Update on Material Litigation under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 1991 Involving Wholly-Owned
Subsidiary, Indegene, Inc.
We wish to inform you that Pursuant to the provisions of Regulation 30 of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure
Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (“Listing Regulations”) and in continuation of disclosures previously made by
Indegene Limited (“the Company”) in its initial public offer documents and subsequent financial results, the
Company is providing an update on material development in relation to the ongoing class-action lawsuit pending
against our wholly-owned overseas subsidiary, Indegene, Inc., before the U.S. District Court, District of New
Jersey.
The lawsuit (Progressive Health and Rehab Corp. v. Indegene, Inc. et al.) relates to alleged violations of the U.S.
Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 1991 (TCPA) concerning certain fax communications executed in February
2020. Following certification of the class in July 2025 and denial of the defendants' petition seeking permission
to appeal the class certification, the parties participated in court-referred mediation and thereafter negotiated
the settlement terms and definitive settlement documentation.
The parties have now substantially concluded negotiations on the definitive settlement agreement. Following
final clarifications from external counsel on August 18, 2026, the Company has confirmed that it has no further
comments on the settlement agreement and has authorized the same to proceed for execution. The settlement
remains subject to execution by the relevant parties and approval of the U.S. District Court. The settlement does
not constitute an admission of liability by the Company or the defendants.
The detailed particulars required under Regulation 30 of the Listing Regulations read with the SEBI Master Circular
No. HO/49/14/14(7)2025-CFD-POD2/I/3762/2026 dated January 30, 2026 are annexed to this letter.
The above information is being made available on the website of the Company https://www.indegene.com/
Kindly take the above-said information on record.
For Indegene Limited
Srishti Ramesh Kaushik
Company Secretary and Compliance Officer
Encl: A/a
Indegene Limited
Third Floor, Aspen G-4 Block, Manyata Embassy
Business Park (SEZ), Outer Ring Road, Nagawara, Bengaluru-
560 045, Karnataka, India
Phone: +91 80 4674 4567, +91 80 4644 7777
compliance.officer@indegene.com
www.indegene.com
CIN: L73100KA1998PLC102040
Annexure – I
Disclosure of information pursuant to Regulation 30 of the Listing Regulations read with the SEBI Master
Circular No. HO/49/14/14(7)2025-CFD-POD2/I/3762/2026 dated January 30, 2026.
Sl. No Particulars Details
1. Name of Opposing Party Progressive Health and Rehab Corp., individually and on
behalf of a certified class.
2. Court / Agency where litigation is filed U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey.
3. Brief Details of Dispute / Litigation Class action litigation alleging violations of the U.S.
Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 1991 in connection
with certain alleged unsolicited fax communications. In July
2025, the Court certified a class comprising approximately
18,851 unique fax numbers (18,869 transmissions).
The defendants' petition seeking permission to appeal the
class certification was subsequently denied. The matter
thereafter proceeded through mediation and settlement
negotiations.
4. Expected financial implications, if any, The settlement framework provides for a maximum
due to compensation, penalty etc. settlement fund of approximately USD 4.72 million,
calculated at USD 250 per eligible fax/claim under the
agreed framework.
The settlement is structured on a claims-made and
reversionary basis, under which the actual amount payable
to class members will depend upon the number of valid and
approved claims submitted. Amounts not required to
satisfy approved claims and other payments contemplated
under the settlement will remain with/revert to the
defendants in accordance with the settlement terms.
The defendants are not required to deposit or pre-fund the
entire USD 4.72 million settlement fund, and payments will
become due in accordance with the settlement agreement
and Court-approved process. The Company has
assessed/shall assess the accounting impact in accordance
with applicable accounting standards.
5. Quantum of Claims, If any The certified class comprises approximately 18,851 unique
fax numbers relating to 18,869 transmissions. The agreed
settlement framework provides for USD 250 per eligible
approved claim, subject to the terms and conditions of the
definitive settlement agreement.
The resulting maximum settlement fund is approximately
USD 4.72 million; however, this represents the contractual
maximum and not the expected cash outflow, since the
settlement is claims-made and actual payments will
depend on valid claims received and approved.
6 The details of any change in the status Since the Company's previous disclosure, the settlement
and/or any development in relation to has progressed from mediation and negotiation of
such proceedings settlement documentation to finalization of the definitive
settlement agreement from the Company's perspective.
External counsel circulated the finalized settlement
agreement for execution and, following
resolution/clarification of the remaining points, the
Company confirmed that it has no further comments and
authorized the agreement to proceed for signature.
The agreed notice mechanics contemplate an initial fax
notice and, where unsuccessful, notice by U.S. First Class
Mail. The parties have identified Analytics as settlement
administrator at an estimated administration cost of
approximately USD 42,559. The settlement does not
require upfront funding or escrow of the maximum
settlement fund.
The next steps are execution by the relevant parties, filing
of the settlement documentation with the Court,
preliminary approval, class notice and claims
administration, followed by final Court approval.
7. In the case of litigation against key Not Applicable. The litigation is against Indegene, Inc. and
management personnel or its promoter certain subsidiaries and does not relate to litigation against
or ultimate person in control, regularly the Company's key managerial personnel or ultimate
provide details of any change in the person in control.
status and/or any development in
relation to such proceedings
8. In the event of settlement of the The settlement framework provides for:
proceedings, details of such settlement (i) a maximum settlement fund of approximately USD
including terms of the settlement, 4.72 million;
compensation / penalty paid (if any) and (ii) payment of USD 250 per eligible approved claim;
impact of such settlement on the (iii) a claims-made structure under which actual
financial position of the listed entity payments depend upon valid claims received and
approved;
(iv) retention/reversion to the defendants of amounts
not required to satisfy approved claims and other
agreed settlement payments;
(v) no requirement to deposit, escrow or pre-fund the
entire maximum settlement fund;
(vi) payment of Court-approved class counsel fees
and other amounts contemplated under the
settlement agreement; and
(vii) Settlement administration in accordance with the
Court-approved notice and claims process.
No payment has been made to class members at this
stage. The definitive settlement remains subject to
execution by the relevant parties and Court approval.
Accordingly, the maximum settlement fund should not be
interpreted as the expected cash outflow. The actual
financial impact will depend principally on the number of
valid claims ultimately submitted and approved, together
with
[Showing first 8,000 characters — download PDF for full document]