BSECompany Update1d ago · 11 Aug 2026, 01:38 pm
Please find enclosed herewith the newspaper advertisement of extract of standalone unaudited Financial Results for quarter ended June 30, 2026
Shantai Industries Ltd · 512297
✦ AI SummaryResults
Shantai Industries Ltd has published its standalone unaudited financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2026, in newspapers as per Regulation 30 and 47 of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
Analysis Scores
Earnings Impact5/10
Growth Catalyst2/10
Governance Concern1/10
Regulatory Risk1/10
Balance Sheet Risk1/10
Liquidity Impact5/10
Market Sentiment5/10
✦ Ask a Question
Ask anything about this announcement — AI will answer based on the filing content.
Full Announcement
Shantai Industries Ltd - 512297 - Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication
Attachments (1)
📄pdf
Download →
f4a3acef-5b52-4565-af96-8498555e9cf7.pdf
View document text
SHANTAI INDUSTRIES LIMITED
CIN: L46411GJ1988PLC013255
Reg Office: Shop 10 2nd Floor, Agrasen Point, Nr Agrasen Bhavan, Citylight Road, Bharthana, Surat, Gujarat, 395007
Website: www.shantaiindustrieslimited.com, Email-id: shantaiindustriesltd@gmail.com, Tel: 0261-2211212
Date: 11/08/2026
BSE LIMITED
Phiroze Jeejeebhoy towers,
Dalal Street,
Mumbai- 400 001.
Scrip ID/Code/ISIN : SHANTAI/512297/INE408F01024
Subject : Intimation of Newspaper Advertisement of Extract of Standalone
Unaudited Financial Results for the quarter ended on June 30, 2026.
Reference No. : Regulation 30 and 47 of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure
Requirements) Regulations, 2015
Dear Sir/Madam,
We wish to inform that pursuant to Regulation 30 and 47 of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure
Requirements) Regulations, 2015, we enclose herewith copies of Extract of Standalone Unaudited
Financial Result for the quarter ended on June 30, 2026 published in Newspapers on Tuesday, August
11, 2026.
1. English Daily: “Free Press Gujarat” dated August 11, 2026.
2. Regional Language Daily: “Lokmitra” dated August 11, 2026.
You are requested to kindly take the same on record.
Yours Faithfully,
Thanking you
For Shantai Industries Limited
Shipra Mehta
Company Secretary and Compliance Officer
Place: Surat
Encl: Copy of Newspaper
11-08-2026 Tuesday
Nepal’s real emergency isn’t Why employee behaviour may decide whether AI adoption deepens
religious; it’s institutional
Companies are investing than casual use. The paper conclusion. Rogers’ diffusion the same organisational
billions in artificial intelligence. does not study employee model, Davis’s Technology permission to experiment. One
They are purchasing AI tools, behaviour or organisational Acceptance Model, and the tries it a few times, receives
rolling out training productivity, but it Unified Theory of Acceptance disappointing answers and
programmes and introducing demonstrates that AI adoption and Use of Technology all returns to familiar methods.
governance policies to varies substantially in depth argue that adoption depends The other treats those early
encourage responsible use. and sophistication rather than on more than technical failures as part of the learning
Progress is usually measured existing as a single, uniform capability. Perceived process. They refine their
through familiar metrics: how phenomenon. usefulness, confidence, social prompts, verify AI outputs,
many employees have access Using AI and using AI well influence and organisational discover new applications and
to AI, how often they use it are not the same thing support consistently shape gradually integrate AI into
and how many have That distinction exposes a whether people incorporate their daily work. This example
completed training. These weakness in how many technologies do not spread I found Rogers’ work so new technologies into their is illustrative rather than a
indicators reveal whether AI organisations evaluate their AI simply because they become relevant to today’s AI work. Technology succeeds finding from AI Premium, but
has entered the workplace. strategies. They often assume available. Adoption depends revolution that I devoted an because people choose to use it reflects a behavioural
They reveal far less about that widespread access and on how people perceive their entire chapter to it in my latest it meaningfully, not simply question that many
whether it has become regular usage indicate relative advantage, whether book, Future of Work: AI because it is available. organisations have yet to
embedded in how employees capability. Yet using AI the technology fits existing Augmented, Autonomous, Why do some employees examine systematically.
think, solve problems and occasionally and integrating it work, whether they can Decentralised. Artificial move from trying AI to relying Technology alone is
Nepal’s prime minister, Thursday, the unrest had make decisions. into everyday work are experiment with it safely and intelligence may represent a on it, while others stop after unlikely to provide the
who had barely spoken in jumped provinces, and only A July 2026 working paper fundamentally different whether they observe others new technological wave, but the first few attempts? The complete answer. Curiosity,
public since taking office in then did the prime minister from the National Bureau of behaviours. Consider two benefiting from its use. The it still enters organisations distinction becomes clearer at persistence, calibrated trust
March, finally addressed the speak. Four days is not a long Economic Research NBER) & organisations. In one, most technology may be new, but through familiar human the level of individual and openness to
nation after at least three time. but it is an eternity in a Yale Department of employees use AI to draft the behavioural mechanisms behaviours. The broader behaviour. Imagine two experimentation all influence
people were killed in fast-moving communal Economics, AI Premium, by emails or summarise behind its adoption remain technology adoption literature employees receiving the same how people respond to
communal violence that began dispute, where each hour of Nicola Borri, Aleh Tsyvinski and documents a few times each remarkably consistent. reaches much the same AI tool, the same training and unfamiliar tools.
in Sunsari district and later official silence matters. Yukun Liu, offers an important week. In the other, fewer
spread to the neighbouring Governments that respond clue. Drawing on roughly 380 employees use AI, but they
Madhesh province. Prime quickly to flashpoints rarely trillion tokens of realised AI rely on it daily to analyse
Minister Balendra Shah see them metastasise into consumption between January information, challenge
appealed for patience, multi-district emergencies. 2024 and April 2026, the assumptions, redesign
restraint and unity after people Governments that respond researchers examine how AI workflows and improve
were killed in the violence, only once the toll has risen use is reflected in firms, decisions. Both organisations
prompting authorities to invite the perception that markets and occupations. can report successful AI
extend the curfew to new violence is what finally earns They find that the market- adoption. Their underlying
areas. attention. implied AI premium is capability may be very
A dispute over President Ramchandra strongest where AI different. This question has
loudspeakers and religious Poudel spoke out before the consumption is associated been studied long before
flags during a Hindu Prime Minister’s address to with frontier models, paid or artificial intelligence arrived.
procession in Sunsari the nation. Opposition core users, seasoned users Everett Rogers' Diffusion of
spiralled, within days, into lawmakers, including and longer prompts rather Innovations demonstrated that
clashes that spread across members of the Nepali
provincial lines into Siraha and Congress, raised the alarm in
Dhanusha. This is not simply Parliament while the
a story about Hindu-Muslim government remained quiet.
tension. It is a story about a
state that keeps discovering,
too late, that it has no early-
warning system for its own
fault lines — and that keeps
responding to crises with
curfews rather than efficient
prevention.
Nepal’s recurring incidents
of communal unrest are not
primarily failures of tolerance
between neighbours. They
are failures of governance —
of a state so consumed by its
own political turnover that it
has neglected the machinery
of local mediation, timely
policing, and visible
accountability that keeps small
disputes from becoming
national emergencies.
The violence in Sunsari
began on a Sunday night. A
curfew followed on Monday. By
11-08-2026 Tuesday
÷÷kkuuffrr{{ººkk,, 2
LLOOKKMMIITTRRAA
…]Úðe rð¿kk™ {tºke zkì. SŒuLÿ ®‚nu ÷kuf‚¼k{kt ÷ur¾Œ sðkƒ{kt y÷
™e™ku y™u Œu™e [ku{k‚k …h™e y‚h rðþu ‚{sqŒe yk…e
RLV{uoþ™ ‚rðo‚e‚ (INCOIS) skufu y÷ ™e™ku yirŒnkr‚f heŒu ðkŒkðhýeÞ …rhrMÚkrŒyku™k (swel
[Showing first 8,000 characters — download PDF for full document]