BSECompany Update8 Aug 2026 · 8 Aug 2026, 05:44 pm

Please refer the enclosed file

Hitachi Energy India Ltd · 543187

✦ AI SummaryResults

Hitachi Energy India Ltd has published unaudited financial results for the first quarter ended June 30, 2026, as approved by the Board of Directors.

Analysis Scores

Earnings Impact5/10
Growth Catalyst2/10
Governance Concern1/10
Regulatory Risk1/10
Balance Sheet Risk1/10
Liquidity Impact5/10
Market Sentiment5/10

✦ Ask a Question

Ask anything about this announcement — AI will answer based on the filing content.

0/500

Full Announcement

Hitachi Energy India Ltd - 543187 - Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication

Attachments (1)

📄

4afb5394-8e54-4f3c-a18d-561862459716.pdf

pdf

Download →
View document text
HITACHI August 08, 2026 The Secretary, The Manager, Listing Department, Listing Department, BSE Limited, National Stock Exchange of India Limited, 1st Floor, Phiroze Jeejeebhoy Towers, ‘Exchange Plaza’, 5th Floor, Plot No. C/1, G Block, Dalal Street, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 001 Mumbai - 400 051 Scrip Code: 543187 Scrip Symbol: POWERINDIA Subject: Newspaper publication of Unaudited Financial Results Dear Sir / Madam, We are enclosing herewith the extracts of the unaudited financial results of the Company for the first quarter ended June 30, 2026, as approved by the Board of Directors at their Meeting held on Friday, August 07, 2026 and published today i.e., on Saturday, August 08, 2026 in “The Hindu Business Line” (English Newspaper) and “Vijaya Karnataka” (Kannada Newspaper). The same is also being made available on the website of the Company at: https://www.hitachienergy.com/in/en/investor-relations/communications-to-stock-exchange. This is pursuant to Regulation 47 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, as amended. Kindly take the same on your records. Thank you, Yours faithfully, For Hitachi Energy India Limited Poovanna Ammatanda General Counsel and Company Secretary Encl.: as above Hitachi Energy India Limited Registered and Corporate Office: 8th Floor, Brigade Opus, 70/401, Kodigehalli Main Road, Bengaluru - 560 092 Email ID: investors@hitachienergy.com Phone: 080 68473700 CIN: L31904KA2019PLC121597 hitachienergy.com/in news bl BENGALURU 7 businessline. SATURDAY-AUGUST8-2026 QUICKLY. SC to examine DPDP law impact FSSAI slaps fine on AWL Agri Business First MD & CEO of IIBX in GIFT City steps down on RTI, investigative journalism for ‘substandard’ oil range, affirming that the EQUAL STATUS. The Supreme Court said both the DPDP Act and the RTI Act are Central legislation Meenakshi Verma Ambwani product was substandard. New Delhi “The Adjudicating Officer, tion on the ground that the Even then, the government Goa, passed the adjudication Krishnadas Rajagopal details sought was of a ‘per- had to disclose if public in- The Food Safety and Stand- order and imposed a penalty New Delhi sonal’ nature. terest outweighed privacy. ards Authority of India (FS- on AWL Agri Business Ltd Ahmedabad: Ashok Kumar The decision whether or not SAI) on Friday said it has im- for manufacturing and mar- Gautam, the first MD and CEO The Supreme Court on Fri- RTI DISCLOSURES to reveal “personal informa- posed a penalty and passed keting a substandard forti- of India International Bullion day agreed to examine The petitioners, represented tion” was taken by a Public an adjudication order on fied edible oil under the pro- Exchange IFSC Ltd(IIBX), has whether the Digital Personal by advocate Vrinda Grover, Information Officer or the AWL Agri Business Ltd for visions of the FSS Act, 2006,” resigned after leading the Data Protection (DPDP) Act argued that the provision First Appellate Authority un- manufacturing and market- said FSSAI. country’s first international of 2023 can be used to cripple had turned the fundamental der the RTI Act after weigh- ing substandard fortified ed- “We have not yet received bullion exchange at GIFT City the Right to Information right to privacy on its head. ing privacy and transparency ible oil under the provisions acertified copy of the order. for more than four years. (RTI) Act by classifying all PRIVACY CONCERN. The Supreme Court heard petitions The right, meant to protect concerns. of the FSS Act, 2006. Based on the information Gautam, who cited personal data as ‘personal’ andsepar- challenging Section 44(3) of the DPDP Act, which amends the RTI ordinary citizens against One of the petitioners, It said that Vitamin A and available to us, the matter reasons for stepping down, is ately to gag investigative Act to deny personal information PTI state incursion, had been ex- Foundation for Media Pro- Vitamin D levels were below relates to fortification levels, currently serving a journalists. tended to protect the state fessionals, represented by the prescribed levels in a specifically of Vitamin D, in three-month notice period, The court said both DPDP and public functionaries advocate Nisha Bhambhani, sample of Fortune Fryola re- the said sample. This is not a sources aware of the Act and the RTIAct areCent- actually harmonise these court would examine if this from RTI disclosures. saidthe 2023 Act could have fined sunflower seed oil. product safety concern, and development told businessline. ral legislation. There is a two,” Justice Joymalya Bag- restrictive or ‘cautionary ap- They argued that Section agrave impact on investigat- It said the order was the said sample was entirely He joined IIBX in February need to actually harmonise chi said. proach’ to sharing data un- 44(3) of the DPDP Act ive journalism. “The Act was passed by the Adjudicating safe for consumption. It may 2022, ahead of the exchange’s them. “The earlier law (RTI He addedthe RTI law op- der the DPDP Act worked to amended Section 8(1)(j) of not granting exemption to Officer, Goa, but did not spe- be noted that added vitamins launch by Prime Minister Act, 2005) gave certain ac- erated on a “much larger do- repeal earlier transparency the RTI Act. Originally, the journalists. If a journalist is cify the penalty amount. are inherently sensitive to Narendra Modi in July that cess with conditions. Here main” than the DPDP Act as legislation. RTI provision exempted au- reporting, they would have A sample of the product, storage conditions, light and year. During his tenure, he led [2023 Act], there is an en DPDP law was only con- The court was hearing thorities from disclosing per- to seek the consent of the which was collected by the time,” said AWL Agri the operational rollout of the bloc embargo. Is this latter cerned with data in digital multiple petitions challen- sonal information to an ap- data principal. If the data FSSAI from Taj Fort Aguada Business. exchange and helpedestablish law repugnant to earlier law? form. The court said this ging provisions of the DPDP plicant if the details sought principal wants to erase the Resort & Spa, Goa, did not “We are reviewing the or- the ecosystem for international This has to be looked into even while acknowledging Act, primarily Section 44(3), had no relationship to any data, they can do it. This has conform to the standards der and will pursue appropri- bullion trading from GIFT City. with extreme circumspec- that data was now over- which amended the RTI Act public activity or if disclos- adirect effect on investigat- prescribed under the FSS ate legal remedies. We reiter- Gautam did not respond to tion. After all, both are cent- whelmingly in the digital to facilitate public authorit- ure would amount to unwar- ive journalism,” the counsel (Fortification of Foods) Reg- ate that we remain fully calls or messages. OUR BUREAU ral laws. There is a need to format. He also said the ies to blankly refuse informa- ranted invasion of privacy. submitted. ulations, 2018, as per the test committed to FSSAI norms,” report of the primary food the company added. lab, it said in a post. Delhi HC stays FSSAI’s prohibition of sale order on Dabur “The levels of Vitamin A PIE FOODS IN THE DOCK and Vitamin D were below Meanwhile, the food safety the prescribed limits, regulator has also directed thereby declaring the Pie Foods to stop the sale of edible oils that have 100 per Till the next date of hearing, over the sales of food without issuing any show- and 100 per cent tender product substandard under Monk Fruit Extract Our Bureau cent claims on their labels. the impugned order is products carrying “mislead- cause notice or providing it coconut water”. Section 3(1)(zx) of the Food Sweetener and Monk Fruit New Delhi Justice Amit Mahajan ob- stayed,” the court observed. ing 100 per cent” claims, in- an opportunity for hearing. “FSSAI directed Dabur In- Safety and Standards Act, Sw [Showing first 8,000 characters — download PDF for full document]