Forwarding of Copy of Newspaper Publication

CLIO INFOTECH LIMITED CIN- L62091GJ1992PLC176950 Regd. Off: Shop - A414, The Capital Science City Road, Sola, Ahmedabad, Gujarat,India, 380060 Email: cs@clioinfotech.com Phone: +91 76739 69519 Date: 8th August,2026 The General Manager Listing Department BSE Limited Phiroze Jeejeebhoy Towers, Dalal Street, Mumbai, Maharashtra– 400001 Dear Sir/Madam, SUBJECT: NEWSPAPER PUBLICATION OF THE FINANCIAL RESULTS ‐ REGULATION 47 OF THE SEBI (LISTING OBLIGATIONS AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS 2015 ("SEBI LISTING REGULATIONS") SCRIPT CODE: 530839 COMPANY SYMBOL: CLIOINFO Respected Sir/Madam, Pursuant to Regulation 47 of the SEBI Listing Regulations, we are enclosing herewith the copy of the Newspaper " Free Press Gujarat (English)" and " Lokmitra – Gujarati " dated August 08, 2026, wherein the extract of Unaudited Standalone and Consolidated Financial Results of the Company for the quarter ended as on June 30, 2026 have been published. Kindly take note of the above. Thanking you, Yours faithfully, For and on behalf of CLIO INFOTECH LIMITED NIKITA TIWADI MANAGING DIRECTOR DIN NO.: 10646772 Encl.: a/a 08-08-2026 Saturday Free speech in the time of the algorithm uprising”, illustrated many of addictive and harmful to young these challenges. Social minds, said, “We left you in this media enabled extraordinary jungle and it robbed you of speed in mobilising public your attention.” Macron made opinion, allowing information, the remark while advocating a images and emotional appeals ban on social media for children to reach millions within hours. under 15. Ursula von der Leyen That ability to organise framed the debate as one of citizens around a common protecting children from cause is, in itself, not a “predatory algorithms” rather democratic failing; indeed, it than restricting free speech. is one of social media’s She said, “This is not about greatest strengths. The whether children can access problem lay elsewhere. social media. It is about Alongside verified information whether and when social travelled rumours, speculation media can access our and half-formed narratives, children.” Anthony Albanese, often stripped of context but while introducing Australia’s amplified by the algorithms’ landmark social media preference for emotionally legislation banning social Social media was once sensationalism over digital ecosystem that charged content. In the race media for those under the age celebrated as the great substance. The business strengthens democratic for attention, accuracy of 16, argued that the aim was democratiser of public model of engagement often discourse and one that frequently became secondary to give children “three more discourse. For decades, legacy elevated the most emotionally steadily corrodes it. The to immediacy. Equally years to build real-world media operated through charged content, regardless stakes could scarcely be revealing was the behavioural connections and online gatekeepers who decided of its accuracy. The result was higher. Perhaps the defining incentive created by the resilience.” India faces a whose voices deserved to be a public conversation that moment in the debate over the platforms themselves. The particularly complex challenge. heard. Entry into that became louder but not power of social media pursuit of virality increasingly Much of its digital public square ecosystem was limited, often necessarily wiser. platforms came when X, became an end in itself. is owned and governed by resembling an exclusive old The irony is striking. formerly Twitter, suspended Visibility, rather than multinational technology boys’ club. Communication Platforms that originally the account of a sitting persuasion, emerged as the companies headquartered flowed largely from emerged as an alternative to President of the United States, principal currency of online outside its borders. These institutions to audiences, and the perceived biases and Donald Trump. Whatever activism. For many young platforms have become the a relatively small number of gatekeeping of legacy media one’s view of that decision, it participants, the pressure to primary arena for political individuals and organisations have themselves become fundamentally altered the be noticed encouraged debate, social mobilisation enjoyed a near monopoly over fertile ground for conversation about who increasingly provocative and the exchange of ideas shaping public opinion. misinformation and unverified exercises power in the digital language and increasingly among hundreds of millions of Social media disrupted claims. While falsehoods can public square. For the first confrontational behaviour. Indians. Yet the rules that order. It gave every citizen eventually be challenged, time, a private technology Civility became less rewarding governing these spaces are a platform, every witness a corrections rarely travel as far company demonstrated that it than outrage, and restraint often framed elsewhere, voice, and every opinion an or as fast as the original could silence one of the most attracted less engagement reflecting corporate priorities audience. The barriers to misinformation. Algorithms powerful political figures in the than aggression. Few of these and global moderation policies participation collapsed almost frequently amplify the initial world. It raised profound individuals set out with the that do not always align neatly overnight. When everyone has sensational claim while giving questions about the intention of degrading public with India’s legal framework, a platform, no one retains a far less visibility to subsequent concentration of power in the discourse. Rather, they were constitutional values or social monopoly over clarifications or factual hands of unelected responding to the incentives realities. This creates an communication. It was a rebuttals. The challenge corporations and the absence embedded within the platforms uncomfortable paradox. A profound shift, one that before us in 2026 is, of universally accepted they used. Algorithms do not sovereign democracy promised a more open, therefore, not whether social standards governing that explicitly instruct users to be increasingly conducts its participatory and pluralistic media should exist. That power. Since then, allegations abusive or inflammatory. They public conversation on public sphere. debate is over. There is no of ideological bias have simply reward the content that platforms over which it That optimism, however, realistic path back to a pre- surfaced across the political generates the greatest exercises only limited proved short-lived. The vision social media world, nor should spectrum and across engagement. Over time, users influence. While these of an unfiltered, unrestricted there be. The democratisation continents. Governments, adapt to those incentives, companies are subject to and un-gatekept marketplace of speech remains one of the political parties and civil learning that the quickest path Indian law, the practical of ideas gradually gave way defining achievements of the society groups in many to visibility often lies in outrage challenges of enforcing to something far more digital age. The real question countries have argued that rather than reasoned national regulations against opaque: the algorithm. is whether societies can social media platforms often argument. That is perhaps the global digital corporations Invisible yet immensely reclaim the public square from operate according to opaque most subtle yet most remain significant. powerful, algorithms began to algorithms whose incentives algorithms and moderation consequential influence of determine what people saw, are increasingly misaligned policies that are divorced from algorithmic platforms. They do read and, ultimately, believed. with the public interest. Left local laws, social norms and not merely distribute speech Instead of individuals entirely unchecked, they risk democratic expectations. but now they shape its choosing informat [Showing first 8,000 characters — download PDF for full document]