NSEPendency of Litigation(s)/dispute(s) or the outcome impacting the Company1 Jul 2026 · 1 Jul 2026, 05:07 pm

Pendency of Litigation(s)/dispute(s) or the outcome impacting the Company

Mukka Proteins Limited · MUKKA

✦ AI SummaryLitigation

Mukka Proteins Limited has informed the Exchange about the pendency of a litigation/dispute that may impact the company. The company received an appellate order from the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) that partly allowed the appeal by deleting additions to the income tax. However, the addition relating to alleged excess stock amounting to ₹7,54,55,608 has been sustained.

Analysis Scores

Earnings Impact5/10
Growth Catalyst2/10
Governance Concern1/10
Regulatory Risk6/10
Balance Sheet Risk4/10
Liquidity Impact8/10
Market Sentiment5/10

✦ Ask a Question

Ask anything about this announcement — AI will answer based on the filing content.

0/500

Full Announcement

Mukka Proteins Limited has informed the Exchange about Pendency of Litigation(s)/dispute(s) or the outcome impacting the Company.

Attachments (1)

📄

MUKKA_01072026170511_Intimation_of_Income_Tax_Order_Panaji.pdf

pdf

Download →
View document text
Date: 01-07-2026 National Stock Exchange of India Limited BSE Limited Exchange Plaza, C-1, Block G Listing Department Bandra Kurla Complex, Dalal Street, Bandra East, Mumbai-400051 Mumbai-400001 Scrip Code: MUKKA Scrip Code: 544135 Dear Sir/Madam, Subject: Intimation under Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. In terms of Regulation 30 read with Schedule III of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, we hereby inform you that the Company has received an Appellate Order from the Office of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Panaji in relation to the appeal filed by the Company against the assessment order passed under the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2018-19. The detailed disclosure as required under Regulation 30 of the Listing Regulations read with SEBI Circular No. SEBI/HO/CFD/CFD-PoD-1/P/CIR/2023/123 dated July 13, 2023, is enclosed as Annexure-A. This is for your information and records. Thanking you, For Mukka Proteins Limited Mehaboobsab Mahmadgous Chalyal Company Secretary & Compliance Officer Membership No.: A67502 Encl: as above. Annexure – A Sr. No. Particulars Details 1. Name(s) of the opposing party, Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, court/ tribunal/agency where Mangalore. The appeal has been decided by the litigation is filed Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Panaji. 2. Brief details of The litigation pertains to the assessment completed under dispute/litigation Section 143(3) read with Section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2018-19. The Assessing Officer had, inter alia, made additions towards (i) alleged excess stock amounting to ₹11,14,72,010 and (ii) prior period income amounting to ₹4,48,21,141. The Company preferred an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Panaji. Vide appellate order dated 30th June 2026, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has partly allowed the appeal by deleting the addition of stock of ₹3,60,16,402 out of ₹11,14,72,010 and deleting the addition of ₹4,48,21,141 after holding that the said income had already been offered to tax in earlier assessment years and therefore cannot be taxed again in Assessment Year 2018-19. However, the addition relating to alleged excess stock amounting to ₹7,54,55,608 has been sustained. 3. Date of receipt of order 30-06-2026 4. Expected financial Pursuant to the appellate order, the addition of implications, if any, due to ₹4,48,21,141 has been deleted and addition of stock of ₹3,60,16,402 has been deleted. However, the addition compensation, penalty etc. relating to alleged excess stock amounting to ₹7,54,55,608 has been sustained. The consequential tax impact, if any, will be determined in accordance with the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 5. Quantum of claims, if any The appeal has been partly allowed. The Company has obtained relief in respect of addition of ₹3,60,16,402 and addition of ₹4,48,21,141. The assessment of alleged excess stock amounting to ₹7,54,55,608 under special tax rate u/s 115BBE has been sustained. The dispute is regarding taxation of income at special tax rate u/s 115BBE (effective rate of 78%). The company has already discharged the tax liability at normal tax rate (effective rate 34.944%). The Company is evaluating the appellate order and considering appropriate legal remedies available under law