BSECompany Update6d ago · 1 Aug 2026, 06:52 pm

K.P. Energy Limited informed the Exchange regarding execution of Power Purchase Agreement with GUVNL for 100 MW Grid Connected Wind Power Project. Disclosure is attached herewith.

K.P. Energy Ltd · 539686

✦ AI Summary▲ PositiveOrder Win

K.P. Energy Ltd has executed a Power Purchase Agreement with GUVNL for a 100 MW Grid Connected Wind Power Project, marking a significant milestone for the company and reinforcing its position as a trusted partner in India's renewable energy sector.

Analysis Scores

Earnings Impact6/10
Growth Catalyst8/10
Governance Concern1/10
Regulatory Risk1/10
Balance Sheet Risk1/10
Liquidity Impact8/10
Market Sentiment8/10

✦ Ask a Question

Ask anything about this announcement — AI will answer based on the filing content.

0/500

Full Announcement

K.P. Energy Ltd - 539686 - Intimation Regarding Execution Of Power Purchase Agreement With GUVNL For 100 MW Grid Connected Wind Power Project

Attachments (1)

📄

beb5d86f-60a0-4618-8397-bf2e5ba659d7.pdf

pdf

Download →
View document text
KPEL/MAT/AUG/2026/659 August 1, 2026 BSE Limited National Stock Exchange of India Limited Phiroze Jeejeebhoy Towers, Exchange Plaza, Dalal Street, Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai - 400001 Bandra (E), Mumbai - 400051 Scrip Code: 539686 Symbol: KPEL Sub.: Execution of Power Purchase Agreement with GUVNL for 100 MW Grid Connected Wind Power Project Dear Sir/Madam, Apropos the captioned subject and pursuant to Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (“SEBI Listing Regulations”), we wish to inform you that the Company has executed the Power Purchase Agreement (“PPA”) with Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited ("GUVNL") for development of a Grid Connected Wind Power Project under IPP segment of the Company, having a contracted capacity of 100 MW. The PPA has been executed pursuant to the Letter of Intent dated March 30, 2026, issued by GUVNL under the tariff-based competitive bidding process conducted under GUVNL's Wind Tender Phase X and subsequent approval from the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission (“GERC”) for the tariff and PPA. This PPA marks yet another significant milestone for the Company, taking its cumulative IPP portfolio past 250 MW and reinforcing its position as a trusted long-term partner to India's leading power utilities in building the nation's renewable energy future. The details as required under Regulation 30 of the SEBI Listing Regulations read with SEBI Master Circular HO/49/14/14(7)2025-CFD-POD2/I/3762/2026 dated January 30, 2026, are enclosed herewith as Annexure -I. Thanking You, Yours Faithfully, For K.P. Energy Limited Affan Faruk Patel Whole Time Director DIN: 08576337 Annexure – I Details under Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 read along with SEBI Master Circular HO/49/14/14(7)2025-CFD-POD2/I/3762/2026 dated January 30, 2026: Sr. Particulars Details 1 Name of the entity awarding the Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited (GUVNL) order(s)/contract(s); 2 Significant terms and conditions of Execution of Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) order(s)/contract(s) awarded in brief; with GUVNL for development of a 100 MW Grid Connected Wind Power Project under GUVNL's Wind Tender Phase X. 3 Whether order(s)/contract(s) have been Domestic Entity awarded by domestic / international entity; 4 Nature of order(s)/contract(s); Power Purchase Agreement 5 whether domestic or international; Domestic 6 Time period by which the order(s)/ Scheduled Commencement of Supply Date is contract(s) is to be executed; July 30, 2028, i.e. 24 months from the date of execution of the PPA. 7 Broad consideration or size of the The aggregate order size is 100 MW Grid order(s)/contract(s) Connected Wind Power Project at an approved tariff ₹3.435/- per unit for a period of 25 years. 8 Whether the promoter/ promoter group / No group companies have any interest in the entity that awarded the order(s)/ contract(s)? If yes, nature of interest and details thereof; 9 Whether the order(s)/contract(s) would fall No within related party transactions? If yes, whether the same No is done at ‘arm’s length’ ****