Disclosure under Regulation 30 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations 2015

The Corporate Relationship Department, National Stock Exchange of India Limited BSE Limited “Exchange Plaza” 1st Floor, New Trading Ring Rotunda Building, P.J. Bandra-Kurla Complex Towers Bandra (E) Dalal Street, Mumbai 400 051 Mumbai 400 001 Scrip Code- 503806 Scrip Code-SRF SRF/SEC/BSE/NSE 5.11.2026 Sub: Disclosure under Regulation 30 of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 Dear Sir, This disclosure is being made pursuant to the SEBI (Listing Obligations & Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (“LODR”). Disclosures under Schedule III, Part-A, Para A (Clause 20) of LODR is given below: i) Name of Authority Office of State Tax Officer, Uttarakhand ii) Nature and details of the action(s) Order imposing a penalty of ₹12,77,382 by the State Tax Officer, taken, initiated or order(s) Uttarakhand, in relation to an alleged mismatch between the passed; particulars mentioned in the Delivery Challan and E-way Bill. iii) Date of receipt of direction or 04.11.2026 at 01.31 p.m. order, including any ad-interim or interim orders, or any other communication from the authority; iv) Details of the The matter relates to a clerical oversight wherein inadvertently in violation(s)/contravention(s) the Delivery challan the tax amount was reflected as Nil. This is committed or alleged to be well reflected by the fact that the E-way bill generated which was committed; accompanying the goods being moved correctly disclosed the accurate GST amount. v) impact on financial, operation or The financial impact is limited to the penalty amount of ₹12,77,382 other activities of the listed entity, which has been paid under protest. As described above, the quantifiable in monetary terms to movement of goods was undertaken under a Delivery Challan the extent possible. against a taxable invoice, and the applicable GST had already been duly discharged through the corresponding tax invoice. There is, therefore, no additional tax liability or loss of revenue to the Government. This issue has therefore arisen nearly due to a procedural/ clerical error and does not alter the substance of the transaction. The Company is therefore of the view that the demand is not legally tenable and will contest the same before the appropriate legal forum(s). Kindly take this intimation on record. Thanking you, Yours faithfully, For SRF Limited Rajat Lakhanpal Sr. Vice President (Corporate Compliance) & Company Secretary