BSECompany Update16h ago · 28 Oct 2026, 03:48 pm
Please find enclosed newspaper intimation for financial results for the quarter and half year ended 30th September, 2026.
Cipla Ltd · 500087
✦ AI SummaryResults
Cipla Ltd has announced unaudited financial results for the quarter and half year ended 30th September, 2026, published in Business Standard and Sakal newspapers.
Analysis Scores
Earnings Impact8/10
Growth Catalyst5/10
Governance Concern2/10
Regulatory Risk1/10
Balance Sheet Risk6/10
Liquidity Impact9/10
Market Sentiment7/10
✦ Ask a Question
Ask anything about this announcement — AI will answer based on the filing content.
Full Announcement
Cipla Ltd - 500087 - Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication
Attachments (1)
📄pdf
Download →
ee4e9cfb-d4c9-49ee-a5ae-dd5da06382f4.pdf
View document text
Cipla
28th October, 2026
(1) BSE Limited (2) National Stock Exchange of India Limited
Listing Department Listing Department
Phiroze Jeejeebhoy Towers, Exchange Plaza, 5th floor,
Dalal Street, Plot no. C/1, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex,
Mumbai - 400 001 Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051
Scrip Code: 500087 Scrip Symbol: CIPLA
(3) SOCIETE DE LA BOURSE DE LUXEMBOURG
Societe Anonyme
35A Boulevard Joseph II,
L-1840 Luxembourg
Sub: Newspaper publication of unaudited financial results (standalone and consolidated) for the
quarter and half year ended 30th September, 2026
Dear Sir / Madam,
We are enclosing herewith copies of newspaper publication made pursuant to Regulation 47 of the SEBI
(Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, for unaudited financial results
(standalone and consolidated) for the quarter and half year ended 30th September, 2026, published in
Business Standard (English) and Sakal (Marathi).
Kindly take the above information on record.
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,
For Cipla Limited
Rajendra Chopra
Company Secretary
Encl: as above
Prepared by: Neelam Padwad
Cipla Ltd.
Regd. Office - Cipla House, Peninsula Business Park, Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai-400 013, India
P +91 22 41916000 W www.cipla.com E-mail contactus@cipla.com Corporate Identity Number L24239MH1935PLC002380
GST officers told to break
multiyear notices yr-wise
monikayadav abh Agarwal, tax partner, beyondtheprescribedlistof
NewDelhi,27October EYIndia. documents. Applicants can
ManojMishra,partnerand better prepare their papers
Noticesongoodsandservices taxcontroversymanagement inadvanceandarelesslikely
tax (GST) for several years leader,GrantThorntonBharat, tobestuckinavoidableback-
cannot be clubbed into one said: “The 57th GST Council and-forth.
showcausenoticewithoutstat- meeting placed procedural Agarwalsaidtheguidance
ing how much is being reformanddisputeprevention “addressesseveralissuesthat
demanded for each of firmlyatthecentreofthenext oftenresultedinground-level
theyears. phaseofGST,andthroughCir- queriesanddisputes,including
Inoneoftheseveralcircu- cular258,itseekstoaddressa coworking spaces, consent-
lars issued on Monday, the recurringfaultlineinGSTliti- based premises, ATMs and
CentralBoardofIndirectTaxes gation, where taxpayers are telecomtowers,andstate-spe-
andCustoms(CBIC)toldtax often compelled to first cific information require-
officers to split the demand challengedefectsinthe ments.Togetherwithdefined
financial year-wise in multi- proceedings before documentationrequirements
yearnoticessothattaxpayers contestingtheunder- for different forms of
couldunderstandandreplyto lyingtaxdemand.By businesses, this should help thenotice. emphasisingevidence- reduce differing interpreta-
Thecircularsfollowtherec- backed notices, year- tionsandmaketheregistration
ommendations made by the wisedelineationofdemands processmorepredictablefor
GSTCouncilatitsmeetingear- in multiyear showcause genuinetaxpayers”.
lierthismonth. notices,andseparategrounds On exports, the CBIC has
Those have set standards andquantificationforfraudu- removedalong-standinggrey
forshowcausenotices,adjudi- lent and non-fraudulent areaforservicesexporters.For
cation orders, and appeals demandsunderSections73& aservicetoqualifyasexport
underGSTsothatproceedings 74,thecircularseekstobring underGST,thepaymentforit
areclearerandfairer. disciplinetotheinitiationand mustmeettheconditionslaid
Anoticemustspelloutthe adjudicationofGSTproceed- downinthelaw.Theclarifica-
facts,evidence,legalprovisions ings.Significantly,whilepre- tion makes it clear that the
andtheamountoftaxbeing scribing yearwise clarity, the money received in special
demanded. Simply copying contentious question of rupeeaccountsmeantfornon-
sections of the law is not whether consolidated multi- residents — such as special
enough.Also,officerscannot yearnoticesarelegallysustain- non-resident rupee (SNRR)
invokethestricterprovisions ableisstillleftunresolved.” accounts, which are rupee
meant for fraud, wilful mis- TheCBIChasissuedclearer accountsopenedbynon-resi-
statement,orsuppressingfacts instructionsonGSTregistra- dentsforspecificbusinesspur-
justbecausetaxhasnotbeen tion. Many businesses face poses,orINRNostroaccounts,
paidoramismatchhasbeen repeat queries or delays held by foreign banks with
found. They must show evi- Conceptually,itbringsasimilar because officers in different Indian lenders — will be
denceofintenttoevadetaxin structuredadjudicationdisci- statesinterpretthesamerules accepted.Ithasalsosaidthatif
thenoticeitself. plinetotheGSTframeworkas differently.Thenewguidance an exporter simply nets off
Adjudication orders must was available through the reducesthatfriction.Itspells whatitissupposedtogetfrom
dealwiththepointsraisedby MasterCircularonshowcause out what documents are overseasagainstwhatitowes
the taxpayer. A line saying noticesandadjudicationinthe neededincommonsituations, forimports,anddoessoinline
“replyhasbeenconsidered”is pre-GSTregime.Theemphasis suchaswhensomeoneoper- with Reserve Bank of India
notacceptable.Officersshould onarticulatedallegations,sup- atesinacoworkingspace,or (RBI)rules,thattoowillcount
explain why they have portingevidence,meaningful whenafamilymemberallows asavalidreceiptofexportpro-
accepted or rejected a sub- consideration of taxpayers’ theuseofitspremises,orwhen ceeds.Inshort,thetaxdepart-
mission. Personal hearing submissions and reasoned the place of business is an mentwillnolongerinsistonly
shouldbemeaningful,butvir- orders should improve the unmannedATMoratelecom onadirectforeign-exchange
tualhearingisencouraged. quality and consistency of tower. It says that officers inflow when the underlying
“Thedetailedguidanceon adjudicationandhelpreduce shouldnotraiseirrelevantor settlementisalreadypermitted
adjudication is significant. avoidablelitigation,”saidSaur- state-specificobjectionsthatgo underforeign-exchangerules.
DPDP Act may hamper investigative
journalism: News publishers to SC
bhavinimishra Senior Advocate Madhavi followedonAugust25. information from organisa-
NewDelhi,27October Divan,appearingforthepeti- The DNPA, which repre- tionshandlingpersonaldata.
tionersonTuesday,arguedthat sents the digital arms of 21 The DNPA argues that the
The Supreme Court (SC) on the law could disrupt news- major news organisations, absence of adequate safe-
Tuesday sought the Centre’s roomoperationsbyrequiring includingTheIndianExpress, guardscouldexposeconfiden-
responsetoapetitionbythe journalists to seek consent TheHindu,IndiaToday, the tial journalistic sources,
DigitalNewsPublishersAssoci- beforeusingpersonalinforma- TimesGroup,Zee,NDTVand includingwhistleblowers,and
ation (DNPA) challenging tionforreporting. Network18,hassoughttostrike discouragethemfromsharing
provisionsoftheDigitalPer- “If I have to ask for per- downnineprovisionsoftheAct information about wrong-
sonalDataProtection(DPDP) missionandconsent,whatis andthreerules. doing.Ithasalsoquestioned
Act,2023,anditsrules.Theplea thepoint?”Divanasked,warn- The petition states that the government’s power to
arguedthattheabsenceofan ing that the law could requirements relating to restrict public access to
exemptionforjournalismcould introduceaformofpre-censor- notice,consentanddeletionof information,arguingthatthe
hamperinvestigativereporting shipbypreventingjournal- personaldatacouldmake provisioncouldbeusedtolimit
andaffectpressfreedom. ists from publishing investigativereporting thedisseminationofnews.
AbenchcomprisingChief reportswithoutprior difficult,particularly Another part of the chal-
Justice of India (CJI) Surya approval. when journalists lengeconcernstheDataPro-
Kant and Justices Joymalya CJIKantsaidthe examine cor- tectionBoardofIndia,which
BagchiandVMohanaissued petitioners, given ruption, miscon- investigatesviolationsofthe
noticeonthepetitionandan their expertise, duct by public lawandcanimposepenalties.
applicationseekinganinterim could suggest safe- officials or other Thepetitionershavera
[Showing first 8,000 characters — download PDF for full document]