BSECompany Update16h ago · 28 Oct 2026, 03:48 pm

Please find enclosed newspaper intimation for financial results for the quarter and half year ended 30th September, 2026.

Cipla Ltd · 500087

✦ AI SummaryResults

Cipla Ltd has announced unaudited financial results for the quarter and half year ended 30th September, 2026, published in Business Standard and Sakal newspapers.

Analysis Scores

Earnings Impact8/10
Growth Catalyst5/10
Governance Concern2/10
Regulatory Risk1/10
Balance Sheet Risk6/10
Liquidity Impact9/10
Market Sentiment7/10

✦ Ask a Question

Ask anything about this announcement — AI will answer based on the filing content.

0/500

Full Announcement

Cipla Ltd - 500087 - Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication

Attachments (1)

📄

ee4e9cfb-d4c9-49ee-a5ae-dd5da06382f4.pdf

pdf

Download →
View document text
Cipla 28th October, 2026 (1) BSE Limited (2) National Stock Exchange of India Limited Listing Department Listing Department Phiroze Jeejeebhoy Towers, Exchange Plaza, 5th floor, Dalal Street, Plot no. C/1, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai - 400 001 Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051 Scrip Code: 500087 Scrip Symbol: CIPLA (3) SOCIETE DE LA BOURSE DE LUXEMBOURG Societe Anonyme 35A Boulevard Joseph II, L-1840 Luxembourg Sub: Newspaper publication of unaudited financial results (standalone and consolidated) for the quarter and half year ended 30th September, 2026 Dear Sir / Madam, We are enclosing herewith copies of newspaper publication made pursuant to Regulation 47 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, for unaudited financial results (standalone and consolidated) for the quarter and half year ended 30th September, 2026, published in Business Standard (English) and Sakal (Marathi). Kindly take the above information on record. Thanking you, Yours faithfully, For Cipla Limited Rajendra Chopra Company Secretary Encl: as above Prepared by: Neelam Padwad Cipla Ltd. Regd. Office - Cipla House, Peninsula Business Park, Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai-400 013, India P +91 22 41916000 W www.cipla.com E-mail contactus@cipla.com Corporate Identity Number L24239MH1935PLC002380 GST officers told to break multiyear notices yr-wise monikayadav abh Agarwal, tax partner, beyondtheprescribedlistof NewDelhi,27October EYIndia. documents. Applicants can ManojMishra,partnerand better prepare their papers Noticesongoodsandservices taxcontroversymanagement inadvanceandarelesslikely tax (GST) for several years leader,GrantThorntonBharat, tobestuckinavoidableback- cannot be clubbed into one said: “The 57th GST Council and-forth. showcausenoticewithoutstat- meeting placed procedural Agarwalsaidtheguidance ing how much is being reformanddisputeprevention “addressesseveralissuesthat demanded for each of firmlyatthecentreofthenext oftenresultedinground-level theyears. phaseofGST,andthroughCir- queriesanddisputes,including Inoneoftheseveralcircu- cular258,itseekstoaddressa coworking spaces, consent- lars issued on Monday, the recurringfaultlineinGSTliti- based premises, ATMs and CentralBoardofIndirectTaxes gation, where taxpayers are telecomtowers,andstate-spe- andCustoms(CBIC)toldtax often compelled to first cific information require- officers to split the demand challengedefectsinthe ments.Togetherwithdefined financial year-wise in multi- proceedings before documentationrequirements yearnoticessothattaxpayers contestingtheunder- for different forms of couldunderstandandreplyto lyingtaxdemand.By businesses, this should help thenotice. emphasisingevidence- reduce differing interpreta- Thecircularsfollowtherec- backed notices, year- tionsandmaketheregistration ommendations made by the wisedelineationofdemands processmorepredictablefor GSTCouncilatitsmeetingear- in multiyear showcause genuinetaxpayers”. lierthismonth. notices,andseparategrounds On exports, the CBIC has Those have set standards andquantificationforfraudu- removedalong-standinggrey forshowcausenotices,adjudi- lent and non-fraudulent areaforservicesexporters.For cation orders, and appeals demandsunderSections73& aservicetoqualifyasexport underGSTsothatproceedings 74,thecircularseekstobring underGST,thepaymentforit areclearerandfairer. disciplinetotheinitiationand mustmeettheconditionslaid Anoticemustspelloutthe adjudicationofGSTproceed- downinthelaw.Theclarifica- facts,evidence,legalprovisions ings.Significantly,whilepre- tion makes it clear that the andtheamountoftaxbeing scribing yearwise clarity, the money received in special demanded. Simply copying contentious question of rupeeaccountsmeantfornon- sections of the law is not whether consolidated multi- residents — such as special enough.Also,officerscannot yearnoticesarelegallysustain- non-resident rupee (SNRR) invokethestricterprovisions ableisstillleftunresolved.” accounts, which are rupee meant for fraud, wilful mis- TheCBIChasissuedclearer accountsopenedbynon-resi- statement,orsuppressingfacts instructionsonGSTregistra- dentsforspecificbusinesspur- justbecausetaxhasnotbeen tion. Many businesses face poses,orINRNostroaccounts, paidoramismatchhasbeen repeat queries or delays held by foreign banks with found. They must show evi- Conceptually,itbringsasimilar because officers in different Indian lenders — will be denceofintenttoevadetaxin structuredadjudicationdisci- statesinterpretthesamerules accepted.Ithasalsosaidthatif thenoticeitself. plinetotheGSTframeworkas differently.Thenewguidance an exporter simply nets off Adjudication orders must was available through the reducesthatfriction.Itspells whatitissupposedtogetfrom dealwiththepointsraisedby MasterCircularonshowcause out what documents are overseasagainstwhatitowes the taxpayer. A line saying noticesandadjudicationinthe neededincommonsituations, forimports,anddoessoinline “replyhasbeenconsidered”is pre-GSTregime.Theemphasis suchaswhensomeoneoper- with Reserve Bank of India notacceptable.Officersshould onarticulatedallegations,sup- atesinacoworkingspace,or (RBI)rules,thattoowillcount explain why they have portingevidence,meaningful whenafamilymemberallows asavalidreceiptofexportpro- accepted or rejected a sub- consideration of taxpayers’ theuseofitspremises,orwhen ceeds.Inshort,thetaxdepart- mission. Personal hearing submissions and reasoned the place of business is an mentwillnolongerinsistonly shouldbemeaningful,butvir- orders should improve the unmannedATMoratelecom onadirectforeign-exchange tualhearingisencouraged. quality and consistency of tower. It says that officers inflow when the underlying “Thedetailedguidanceon adjudicationandhelpreduce shouldnotraiseirrelevantor settlementisalreadypermitted adjudication is significant. avoidablelitigation,”saidSaur- state-specificobjectionsthatgo underforeign-exchangerules. DPDP Act may hamper investigative journalism: News publishers to SC bhavinimishra Senior Advocate Madhavi followedonAugust25. information from organisa- NewDelhi,27October Divan,appearingforthepeti- The DNPA, which repre- tionshandlingpersonaldata. tionersonTuesday,arguedthat sents the digital arms of 21 The DNPA argues that the The Supreme Court (SC) on the law could disrupt news- major news organisations, absence of adequate safe- Tuesday sought the Centre’s roomoperationsbyrequiring includingTheIndianExpress, guardscouldexposeconfiden- responsetoapetitionbythe journalists to seek consent TheHindu,IndiaToday, the tial journalistic sources, DigitalNewsPublishersAssoci- beforeusingpersonalinforma- TimesGroup,Zee,NDTVand includingwhistleblowers,and ation (DNPA) challenging tionforreporting. Network18,hassoughttostrike discouragethemfromsharing provisionsoftheDigitalPer- “If I have to ask for per- downnineprovisionsoftheAct information about wrong- sonalDataProtection(DPDP) missionandconsent,whatis andthreerules. doing.Ithasalsoquestioned Act,2023,anditsrules.Theplea thepoint?”Divanasked,warn- The petition states that the government’s power to arguedthattheabsenceofan ing that the law could requirements relating to restrict public access to exemptionforjournalismcould introduceaformofpre-censor- notice,consentanddeletionof information,arguingthatthe hamperinvestigativereporting shipbypreventingjournal- personaldatacouldmake provisioncouldbeusedtolimit andaffectpressfreedom. ists from publishing investigativereporting thedisseminationofnews. AbenchcomprisingChief reportswithoutprior difficult,particularly Another part of the chal- Justice of India (CJI) Surya approval. when journalists lengeconcernstheDataPro- Kant and Justices Joymalya CJIKantsaidthe examine cor- tectionBoardofIndia,which BagchiandVMohanaissued petitioners, given ruption, miscon- investigatesviolationsofthe noticeonthepetitionandan their expertise, duct by public lawandcanimposepenalties. applicationseekinganinterim could suggest safe- officials or other Thepetitionershavera [Showing first 8,000 characters — download PDF for full document]