BSECompany Update1d ago · 19 Oct 2026, 03:19 pm
Copy of order dated October 16,2026 issued by NCLAT
Dharan Infra-EPC Ltd · 541161
✦ AI Summary▼ NegativeInsolvency
Dharan Infra-EPC Ltd has been admitted into Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) by NCLAT. The order was passed on October 16, 2026, following a petition by Tata Capital Housing Finance Limited under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The CIRP was initiated against Dharan Infra-EPC Limited for default in repayment of an amount of Rs. 28,04,91,115/-.
Analysis Scores
Earnings Impact2/10
Growth Catalyst1/10
Governance Concern8/10
Regulatory Risk9/10
Balance Sheet Risk8/10
Liquidity Impact2/10
Market Sentiment1/10
✦ Ask a Question
Ask anything about this announcement — AI will answer based on the filing content.
Full Announcement
Dharan Infra-EPC Ltd - 541161 - Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP)-Updates - Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP)
Attachments (1)
📄pdf
Download →
05eb6e41-25f1-473d-b445-4a0c94fc135f.pdf
View document text
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
COURT-V, MUMBAI BENCH
4. IA/166/2026C.P. (IB)/729(MB)2025
IN THE MATTER OF
Tata Capital Housing Finance Limited
Dharan Infra-EPC Limited
U/s 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
Order Delivered on 16.10.2026
CORAM:
SH. VINAY GOEL SH. CHARANJEET SINGH GULATI
MEMBER (J) MEMBER (T)
Appearance through VC/Physical/Hybrid Mode:
For the Petitioner:
For the Respondent:
ORDER
IA/166/2026: The above IA is listed for pronouncement of the order. The same
is pronounced in open court, vide a separate order.
Sd/- Sd/-
VINAY GOEL CHARANJEET SINGH GULATI
Member (Judicial) Member (Technical)
//Rahul//
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
MUMBAI BENCH – COURT - V
IVN. P./8/2026
1. Mr. Gajanan Damodar Deokar
2. M/s. G.D. Deokar & Sons
… Financial Creditors
Versus
1. Palak Swapnil Doshi
IRP of Dharan Infra-EPC Limited
2. Tata Capital Housing Finance Limited
3. Dharan Infra-EPC Limited
… Respondents
IVN.P./9/2026
1. M/s. Metro Associates
Through its Partner Mr. Heman Pokardas
Tilokani
2. Metro Ploymers Private Limited
… Financial Creditors
Versus
1. Palak Swapnil Doshi
IRP of Dharan Infra-EPC Limited
2. Tata Capital Housing Finance Limited
3. Dharan Infra-EPC Limited
… Respondents
IVN.P./15/2026
M/s. Metro Industries
Through its Partner Mr. Heman Pokardas
Tilokani
… Financial Creditor
Versus
1. Palak Swapnil Doshi
IRP of Dharan Infra-EPC Limited
I.A./166/2026, IVN. P./8/2026, IVN. P./9/2026, IVN. P./15/2026,
IVN. P./24/2026, IVN. P./25/2026, IVN. P./81/2026, IVN. P./129/2026.
2. Tata Capital Housing Finance Limited
3. Dharan Infra-EPC Limited
… Respondents
IVN.P./24/2026
LIC Housing Finance Limited
… Financial Creditor
Versus
Dharan Infra-Epc Limited
… Corporate Debtor
IVN.P./25/2026
Capri Global Capital Limited
… Financial Creditor
Versus
Palak Swapnil Desai
IRP of Dharan Infra-EPC Limited
… Respondent
IVN.P./81/2026
Canara Bank
… Financial Creditor
IVN.P./129/2026
Devesh Karda
Suspended Director of the Corporate
Debtor
… Petitioner
Versus
Palak Swapnil Desai
IRP of Dharan Infra-Epc Limited
… Respondent
I.A./ 166 (MB) / 2026
Page 2 of 27
I.A./166/2026, IVN. P./8/2026, IVN. P./9/2026, IVN. P./15/2026,
IVN. P./24/2026, IVN. P./25/2026, IVN. P./81/2026, IVN. P./129/2026.
Under Section 12A of the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code, 2016, read with Regula-
tion 30A(1)(a) of the IBBI (Insolvency Reso-
lution Process for Corporate Persons) Reg-
ulations, 2016.
Palak Swapnil Desai
IRP of Dharan Infra-EPC Limited
901, 9th Floor, Park Vistas, Opposite Lal-
lubhai Park, Near MTNL, Andheri West,
Mumbai – 400 058.
… Applicant
C.P. / 729 (MB) / 2025
Under Section 7 of the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Tata Capital Housing Finance Limited
… Petitioner
Dharan Infra-EPC Limited
… Respondent
Order Pronounced On: 16.10.2026
Coram:
Shri. Vinay Goel Shri Charanjeet Singh Gulati
Hon’ble Member (Judicial) Hon’ble Member (Technical)
Appearances:
For the Petitioner LIC
Housing Finance in
Intervention Petition
no. 24/2026 filed in
IA 166/26 in CP 729/2025: Adv. Akhil Sarathy I/b Raghavan Sarathy
For the Applicant in
IVN.P/9/2026: Adv. Shawn Fernandes (VC)
For the Applicant in
IVN.P/15/2026 Adv. Shawn Fernandes (VC)
Page 3 of 27
I.A./166/2026, IVN. P./8/2026, IVN. P./9/2026, IVN. P./15/2026,
IVN. P./24/2026, IVN. P./25/2026, IVN. P./81/2026, IVN. P./129/2026.
For the Applicant in
IVN.P/8/2026: Adv. Prachi Wazalwar (VC)
For the Intervenor in
IVN.P/25/2026: Adv. Shadab Jan, Adv. Narpat Singh i/b ANM
Global (VC)
For the Int. Petition
no 81 of 2026: Adv rukshin Ghiara and Ishwar Ahuja ib Saga
Legal (VC)
For the Applicants in
IVN.P/129/2026: Adv. Swapnil Balajiwale a/w. Sr. Adv. Vikram
Nankani (PH)
For the Tata Capital
Housing Finance Limited: Adv. Sanjeev Singh, Adv. Sandipa Bhattachar-
jee, Adv. Anshita Argal (VC)
Adv. Kartik Sharma
For the RP: Adv. Kunal Kanungo, Adv. Tanushree Sogani
& Adv. Atishay Jain (PH)
For the Intervenor in
IVN.P/25/2026: Adv. Shadab Jain, Adv. Narpat Singh i/b AVM
Global (PH)
For the Respondent:
ORDER
1. I.A. No. 166 of 2026 has been filed by the Interim Resolution
Professional (“IRP”) under Section 12A of the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“Code”), seeking withdrawal of the Corporate
Insolvency Resolution Process (“CIRP”) initiated against Dharan Infra-
EPC Limited (“Corporate Debtor”). I.A. No. 129 of 2026 has been filed
by the Suspended Director of the Corporate Debtor, seeking the same
relief. Further, six Financial Creditors have filed Intervention Petitions
under Section 60(5) of the Code read with Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules,
seeking to intervene in I.A. No. 166 of 2026 and oppose the proposed
withdrawal of the CIRP.
2. Since the reliefs sought in I.A. No. 166/2026, I.A. No. 129/2026 and
IVN. P. Nos. 8/2026, 9/2026, 15/2026, 24/2026, 25/2026 and
Page 4 of 27
I.A./166/2026, IVN. P./8/2026, IVN. P./9/2026, IVN. P./15/2026,
IVN. P./24/2026, IVN. P./25/2026, IVN. P./81/2026, IVN. P./129/2026.
81/2026 are interrelated, all the aforesaid Applications were heard
analogously and are being disposed of by this common order.
3. Brief facts of I.A./166/2026:
3.1 It is submitted that the Company Petition 729 of 2025 has been filed by
Tata Capital Housing Finance Limited (“Financial Creditor”) under
Section 7 of the Code seeking initiation of CIRP against Corporate
Debtor for default in repayment of an amount of Rs. 28,04,91,115/-.
3.2 This Tribunal, vide order dated 12.12.2025 (“Admission Order”),
admitted the Corporate Debtor into the CIRP and appointed the
Applicant as the IRP. The IRP published Form A dated 15.12.2025,
inviting claims from the creditors of the Corporate Debtor, the last date
of submission of proof of claims as per the published Form A was on or
before 26.12.2025.
3.3 It is submitted that the last date to constitute the Committee of
Creditors (“CoC”) as per Regulation 13 & Regulation 17 of the
(Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations,
2016 (“CIRP Regulations”) was 04.01.2026.
3.4 During the pendency of final verification of claims and before the
constitution of the CoC, the IRP was informed by the Financial Creditor
that they had amicably settled the matter with the suspended director
of the Corporate Debtor.
3.5 Further, the Financial Creditor, vide email dated 01.01.2026, informed
the IRP that they had received an amount of Rs.10 Crore from the
Corporate Debtor as a “Full and Final Settlement”. Thereafter, the
Financial Creditor issued Form FA dated 01.01.2026 confirming that
the CIRP cost has been paid to the Applicant.
3.6 It is submitted that, in an Appeal filed by the Promoter of the Corporate
Debtor, challenging the admission order, the Hon’ble NCLAT, vide order
dated 06.01.2026, directed the IRP to collate the claims in accordance
Page 5 of 27
I.A./166/2026, IVN. P./8/2026, IVN. P./9/2026, IVN. P./15/2026,
IVN. P./24/2026, IVN. P./25/2026, IVN. P./81/2026, IVN. P./129/2026.
with law, however, restrained him from taking any further steps.
Further, the IRP was granted liberty to file an Application under Section
12A of the Code.
3.7 Accordingly, the present Application has been filed by the IRP, seeking
withdrawal of C.P.729 of 2025.
4. Brief facts of IVN. P./8/2026:
4.1 It is submitted that the Applicant Nos. 1 and 2 are Financial Creditors
of the Corporate Debtor with an outstanding debt of Rs. 3,94,86,800/-
and Rs. 6,84,77,605/-, respectively. On failure of the Corporate Debtor
to repay the outstanding debt amount, the Financial Creditors had filed
Company Petition 588 of 2025 under Section 7 of the Code, which was
argued and reserved for orders on 18.11.2025.
4.2 It is submitted that the Company Petition 729 of 2025 was reserved for
orders by this Tribunal vide order dated 08.11.2025, and the same was
admitted vide order dated 12.12.2025
4.3 In light of the aforesaid, this Tribunal, vide order dated 15.12.2025,
dismissed the Company Petition 588 of 2025 and directed the
Applicants to file claim before the IRP. Accordingly, the Applicants have
submitted their claim in Form C to th
[Showing first 8,000 characters — download PDF for full document]