NSECorporate Insolvency Resolution Process25 Jun 2026 · 25 Jun 2026, 12:54 pm
Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process
Vikram Solar Limited · VIKRAMSOLR
✦ AI SummaryInsolvency
Vikram Solar Limited has informed the Exchange about the submission of Order copy of the NCLAT in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The company has deposited an amount of Rs. 91,98,556/- by way of demand draft in favour of Pay & Accounts Officer, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, New Delhi, which would be for the full and final settlement of the claim of the operational creditor, namely, Isitva Steel Private Limited. The next date of hearing of the matter is on 29 June 2026.
Analysis Scores
Earnings Impact5/10
Growth Catalyst2/10
Governance Concern8/10
Regulatory Risk9/10
Balance Sheet Risk6/10
Liquidity Impact4/10
Market Sentiment5/10
✦ Ask a Question
Ask anything about this announcement — AI will answer based on the filing content.
Full Announcement
Vikram Solar Limited has informed the Exchange about the submission of Order copy of the NCLAT in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process
Attachments (1)
📄pdf
Download →
VSLCS_25062026125422_VSL_submission_of_NCLAT_order_June_24_2026_signed.pdf
View document text
25 June 2026
VSL/CS/344/2026 dated 25.06.2026
BSE Limited. National Stock Exchange of India Ltd.
Department of Corporate Services Listing Department
P. J. Towers, Dalal Street, Mumbai – 400 001 Exchange Plaza, Bandra-Kurla Complex,
(Scrip Code: Equity - 544488) Bandra (E), Mumbai – 400 051
(Symbol: VIKRAMSOLR, Series EQ)
Dear Sir/ Madam
Sub: Disclosure under Regulation 30 of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements)
Regulations, 2015, as amended (“SEBI Listing Regulations”)- Submission of Order copy
Pursuant to Regulation 30 of the SEBI Listing Regulations and in furtherance to our intimation having
reference no VSL/CS/343/2026 dated 24 June 2026, we enclose herewith a copy of the order dated 24
June 2026 passed by the Hon'ble National Company Law Appellate Tribunal , Principal Bench , New Delhi
(“NCLAT Order”) whereby the Hon’ble NCLAT has stayed the order passed by the Hon’ble National
Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata Bench dated 12 June 2026.
In furtherance of the NCLAT Order, we have deposited an amount of Rs. 91,98,556/- (Rupees Ninety-
One Lakhs Ninety-Eight Thousand Five Hundred and Fifty-Six only) by way of demand draft in favour of
Pay and Accounts Officer, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, New Delhi, which would be for the full and final
settlement of the claim of the operational creditor, namely, Isitva Steel Private Limited.
The next date of hearing of the matter is on 29 June 2026.
The Company continues to actively pursue an expeditious closure of the proceedings in accordance with
applicable legal processes.
Kindly take the above information on record.
Sincerely,
For and on behalf of
Vikram Solar Limited
Sudipta Bhowal
Company Secretary &
Compliance Officer
Encl.: Order of NCLAT dated 24.06.2026
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 1087 of 2026
IN THE MATTER OF:
Sameer Nagpal …Appellant (s)
Suspended Director of Vikram Solar Ltd.
Versus
ISITVA Steel Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. ...Respondent (s)
Present:
For Appellant : Dr. A.M. Singhavi and Mr. Abhijeet Sinha, Sr.
Advocates, Mr. Diwakar Maheshwari, Mr. Kumar
Saurab Singh, Mr. Aseem Chaturvedi, Mr. Dipen
Chatterjee, Mr. Vishnu Sriram, Mr. Oshik Bagchi,
Mr. Avishka Singhvi, Mr. Shivank Diddi, Mr.
Shreyas Edupuganti, Mr. A. Ramaih, Mr. Siddharth
Seem, Advocates.
For Respondents : Mr. Ratnanko Banerjee, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Arkaj
Kumar, Mr. Akshat Mittal, Mr. R. N. Ghose, S.
Santa, Advocates for R-1.
Mr. Dhruv Goel, Ms. Ruchika Dhandhania,
Advocates for R-2/IRP.
O R D E R
(Hybrid Mode)
24.06.2026: Heard Dr. A.M. Singhavi as well as Mr. Abhijeet Sinha, Ld.
Sr. Counsels appearing for the appellant as well as Ld. Counsels appearing
for Respondents No.1 & 2 and perused the record.
2. Ld. Sr. Counsel appearing for the appellant submits that though the
appellant is having a very good case on merits but without prejudice to his
rights he is ready to deposit Rs. 91 lakhs to show bonafide of the appellant.
It is further submitted that earlier the parties have entered into a settlement
whereby the earlier contract was preceded and in full and final settlement
Cont’d…/-
the parties had agreed to pay/ receive Rs. 4,60,49,000/- and out of this
amount Rs. 4,14,00,000/- were already paid.
3. It is further submitted that thereafter Rs. 70 lakhs were again paid to
the Operational Creditor and in this regard an email dated 04.02.2023 was
also sent by the Operational Creditor whereby they have acknowledged the
liability of only Rs. 91,98,556/-.
4. It is submitted that the appellant is ready to deposit Rs. 91,98,556/-
by way of demand draft in favour of Pay & Accounts Officer, Ministry of
Corporate Affairs, New Delhi.
5. Ld. Counsel appearing for the Respondent No.1 & 2 have not shown
objection so far as the deposition of the amount of Rs. 91,98,556/- is
concerned.
6. It is also submitted by Ld. Counsel for Respondent No.1 that the
amount of Rs. 91,98,556/- which would be deposited by the appellant
through the demand draft would be for the full and final settlement of the
claim of the Operational Creditor as is shown in the application moved before
the Ld. Adjudicating Authority.
7. It is further submitted that the Appellant is a listed company with a
market capitalisation of approximately Rs. 9,000 Crores, and generating a
revenue in excess of Rs. 4,800 Crores, and approximately a workforce of
3,500 employees is existing on its payrolls, thus, the initiation of insolvency
would have a bad impact not only on the financial aspect of the company but
Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 1087 of 2026
will also cast shadow on its otherwise good financial reputation. It is thus
requested that the impugned order be stayed.
8. Ld. Counsel appearing for Respondents No.1 & 2 is not having any
objection to the request made by Ld. Sr. Counsel appearing for the appellant
on the score that the whole admitted amount as claimed by the Operational
Creditor is being deposited by the appellant through demand draft of
Rs.91,98,556/-.
9. Ld. Sr. Counsels appearing for the appellant has also brought in our
knowledge an order of this appellate tribunal dated 12.05.2026 passed in
Comp. App. (AT) (Ins.) No. 850 of 2026 in ‘Nishant Avinash Fadia vs. Raspalfa
Services Private Limited & Anr.’ whereby the impugned order therein was
stayed in similar circumstances and it is submitted that this interim order
was challenged by filing an appeal before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil
Appeal No. 7946 of 2026 and the said order has not been interfered by the
Hon’ble Supreme Court.
10. Keeping in view all the facts and circumstances of this case and having
an eye on the order passed in ‘Nishant Avinash Fadia vs. Raspalfa Services
Private Limited & Anr.’ which has been affirmed by the Hon’ble Supreme
Court, we direct that the impugned order dated 12.06.2026 passed by Ld.
NCLT Kolkata-I bench shall remain stayed till the next date of listing.
11. Ld. Counsel for the parties if so wish may file their reply/short reply
till the next date of listing.
Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 1087 of 2026
12. Appellant shall deposit demand draft of Rs. 91,98,556/- in favour of
Pay and Accounts Officer, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, New Delhi till the
next date of listing.
13. List this matter on 29.06.2026 under the same caption before the
appropriate bench.
[Justice Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan]
Member (Judicial)
[Mr. Barun Mitra]
Member (Technical)
SA/mr
Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 1087 of 2026