NSEBagging/Receiving of orders/contracts28 Sept 2026 · 28 Sept 2026, 09:53 am
Bagging/Receiving of orders/contracts
Dilip Buildcon Limited · DBL
✦ AI Summary▲ PositiveOrder Win
Dilip Buildcon Limited has been declared as L-1 bidder for a Rs. 688.23 Crore order from National Highways Authority of India for the construction of a 4-lane elevated corridor in Solapur City, Maharashtra. The project will be executed on a Hybrid Annuity basis over 24 months with an operation period of 15 years.
Analysis Scores
Earnings Impact8/10
Growth Catalyst9/10
Governance Concern1/10
Regulatory Risk2/10
Balance Sheet Risk5/10
Liquidity Impact9/10
Market Sentiment9/10
✦ Ask a Question
Ask anything about this announcement — AI will answer based on the filing content.
Full Announcement
Dilip Buildcon Limited has informed the Exchange about Bagging/Receiving of orders/contracts
Attachments (1)
📄pdf
Download →
DBL_28092026095321_Intimation.pdf
View document text
September 28, 2026
BSE Limited National Stock Exchange of India Ltd.
Phiroze Jeejeebhoy Towers Exchange Plaza, C-1, Block G,
Dalal Street Bandra Kurla Complex,
Mumbai- 400001 Bandra (E)
Mumbai – 400 051
Scrip Code – 540047 Scrip Code – DBL
Sub: Dilip Buildcon Limited has been declared as L-1 bidder for “Construction of 4 lane elevated corridor
including approaches from Old Pune Naka to Boramani Naka on NH-65 in Solapur City in the State of
Maharashtra on Hybrid Annuity Mode (Km 0.050 to Km 9.710)”, order worth Rs. 688.23 Crores.
In accordance with the provisions of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure
Requirements) Regulations, 2015, we are pleased to inform you that the Company has been declared as L-1 bidder for
the tender floated by the National Highways Authority of India (“NHAI”) on Hybrid Annuity basis in the state of
Maharashtra.
Details of the project are as under:
Project Project Cost Mode Completion and Length
excluding Operation Period
(Rs. in Cr.)
“Construction of 4 lane elevated corridor
24 Months
including approaches from Old Pune Naka to
Boramani Naka on NH-65 in Solapur City in the 688.23 HAM 9.66 Km
Operation Period 15
State of Maharashtra on Hybrid Annuity Mode.
years from COD
(Km 0.050 to Km 9.710).
Further, the detailed disclosure as required pursuant to Regulation 30 read with Para A of Part A of Schedule III of the
SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (“Listing Regulations”), as amended from
time to time, read with SEBI/HO/CFD/CFD-PoD1/P/CIR/2023/123 dated July 13, 2023 is exhibited hereunto as
“Annexure A”
Further, as per Company's Code of conduct of Prevention of insider trading and pursuant to Securities and Exchange
Board of India (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015 as amended from time to time, the trading window
for dealing in the securities of the Company for all insiders, designated persons and their immediate relatives, connected
persons, fiduciaries and intermediaries shall be closed till 48 hours from the date the said information generally made
available with the public.
We request you to kindly take this information on your record.
For & on behalf of
Dilip Buildcon Limited
Abhishek Shrivastava
Company Secretary
Annexure A
S.no Particulars Description
1. Name of the entity awarding the order(s) National Highways Authority of India
/contract(s);
2. Significant terms and conditions of General Contract (L1)
order(s)/contract(s) awarded in brief
3. Whether order(s) / contract(s) have been Domestic Entity
awarded by domestic/ international entity
4. Nature of order(s) / contract(s); “Construction of 4 lane elevated corridor including
approaches from Old Pune Naka to Boramani Naka
on NH-65 in Solapur City in the State of Maharashtra
on Hybrid Annuity Mode. (Km 0.050 to Km 9.710).
5. Whether domestic or international Domestic
6. Time period by which the order(s) / 24 Months and Operation Period 15 years from COD
contract(s) is to be executed
7. Broad consideration or size of the order (s) / INR 688.23 Cr (Excluding GST)
contract (s);
8. Whether the promoter/ promoter group No
companies have any interest in the entity that
awarded the order(s)/contract(s )?
9. Whether the order(s)/contract(s) would fall No
within related party transactions? If yes,
whether the same is done at "arm's length".