Announcement Under regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication.

MADHAV INFRA PROJECTS LIMITED CIN: L45200GJ1992PLC018392 Madhav House, Plot No. 4 Near Panchratna Building Subhanpura, Vadodara-390 023, Telefax : 0265-2290722 www.madhavcorp.com To, Date: 08th September, 2026 BSE Limited Phiroze Jeejeebhoy Towers Dalal Street Mumbai – 400 001 Sub: Newspaper Advertisements regarding Notice of the 33rd Annual General Meeting (AGM) and Remote e-voting under Regulation 47 and Regulation 30(2) read with Schedule III of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 Ref: Madhav Infra Projects Limited (Security Id: MADHAVIPL, Scrip Code: 539894) Dear Sir/Ma’am, Pursuant to Regulation 30(2) read with Clause 12 of Para A of Schedule III of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, please find enclosed newspaper advertisements for publication of Notice of 33rd Annual General Meeting of the company scheduled to be held on 30th September, 2026, Wednesday at 12:30 P.M. (IST) through Video Conferencing / Other Audio-Visual Means. Record date, Book Closure, Information for E-Voting, and other related information have been detailed in the following newspapers; 1. Free Press (Gujarat Edition)-English language 2. Lokmitra (Gujarat Edition)-Gujarati Language The newspaper advertisements may also be accessed on the website of the Company at the https://madhavcorp.com/annualreports.html You are requested to kindly take note of the above information. Thanking You. Yours faithfully, For Madhav Infra Projects Limited Ishwari Kumari Sindha Company Secretary & Compliance Officer M. No. A80997 Encl: A/a 08-09-2026 Tuesday Nepal’s floods reveal a Mecca pact: More smoke than fire bigger Himalayan crisis The Mecca Joint Defence geographically distant in militarily, during its conflicts Gulf states seek greater Agreement has created a buzz Southeast Asia, has also with India, including, more regional collective security, but because it suggests that an expressed interest. recently, during Operation that is not tantamount to attack on any one of the three The problem is not that the Sindoor. The likelihood of the relinquishing the US security — Turkey, Saudi Arabia and pact has no geographical Mecca pact providing the umbrella. Can decisions that Pakistan — constitutes an outline, but that its geography foundation for a meaningful impact regional security be attack against all. It has also is potentially elastic enough to regional security architecture taken without consulting the fuelled speculation about a undermine the concept of a is low. The more the group US? The pact’s greatest new collective security regional security organisation. expands, the less cogent or weakness may lie in its arrangement in West Asia at Such a pact would be convergent it is likely to ambition. By trying to evolve a time when the US security incapable of effectively become. In fact, it risks a broad Islamic security architecture appears addressing challenges faced becoming yet another Islamic framework rather than a challenged by the ongoing by members across several grouping without a clear tightly defined alliance, it risks conflict with Iran, now in its regions. roadmap for common military sacrificing strategic coherence sixth month. However, a The second issue is that with a regional adversary. Saudi Arabia in September action. Reports suggest that for political symbolism. The Himalaya is the bomb and cause massive defence pact that cannot the pact is being seen as a Turkey’s objective is to use its 2025, Pakistan is reported to the Istanbul meeting on Pakistan’s economy is in youngest, most fragile and devastation in downstream clearly define either its collective-deterrence securitised relations with have deployed a squadron of August 31 agreed to establish dire straits. It frequently seeks tectonically active mountain areas of India as well as geographical scope or arrangement, though not potential buyers to sell fighter aircraft and an air a secretariat in Riyadh, with a financial bailouts from wealthy system in the world. Bangladesh. The severity of common threat represents directed against any specific defence equipment and defence system earlier this Pakistani Secretary General at Islamic nations. The Mecca Spreading over an area of this risk can be referenced less an institutionalised country. Does it nevertheless expand its geopolitical year, but its effectiveness is far the helm for the first three pact may provide yet another about 2,500 km in length and from the April 2015 security architecture than an possess a sufficiently footprint. from clear. If the existing years. If experience with the platform for Saudi Arabia to 400 km in width, it is the earthquake in Nepal of this exercise in strategic signalling convergent threat perception Pakistan’s motivations are Saudi-Pakistan mutual- Riyadh-based IMCTC (Islamic rescue Pakistan from biggest water tower of Asia magnitude that killed and deterrence. to make collective defence different. It has long provided defence agreement did not Military Counter Terrorism economic collapse. Yet, due to its snow and glaciers. thousands of people and The pact raises several credible? troops to Saudi Arabia to produce an automatic Coalition), led by a retired Turkey’s growing military Its natural resources — annihilated Nepal’s questions. First, how is the Security challenges for guard against internal security Pakistani military response, Pakistani Chief of Army Staff, relationship with Pakistan forests, rivers and minerals — hydropower stations. “region” defined for the Saudi Arabia stem from Iran threats. In 2015, when the what makes the trilateral is any guide, not much can be cannot be ignored, whether support people’s livelihoods, But the looming threat of purpose of mutual security? and the Houthis of Yemen, Houthis attacked Saudi cities, commitment materially expected. joint exercises, military- ecology and economies, but destruction has not stopped Pakistan is neither part of apart from radicalism. Turkey, Islamabad made clear that it different? Beyond signalling, the pact industrial collaboration or its steep slopes, altitudes and the quest for these projects. West Asia nor the Gulf. a NATO member, would not get involved. It was Conversely, when Pakistan has limitations. Turkey and intelligence sharing. climatic conditions increase its Even India is initiating Pakistan has long been drawn countenances threats from a similar situation in 2019, and the Taliban engaged in a Saudi Arabia are historical The important question is vulnerability to natural construction of more than 200 towards Turkey and Saudi Syria, Iraq and Kurdish militant when the energy border conflict last year, Saudi competitors for the mantle of not whether India should be disasters such as dams in the Northeast, Arabia as leaders of the groups. Terrorism, the flow of infrastructure at Abqaiq and Arabia did not extend any regional leadership. Turkey’s concerned by an “Islamic earthquakes, rockfalls, especially in Arunachal Islamic world. If Bangladesh refugees and instability on its Khurais in eastern Saudi military aid to Pakistan. In association with NATO can be NATO”. The real question is landslides, soil erosion, land Pradesh. Additionally, India joins, the “region” would southern borders add to the Arabia was attacked. Turkey’s case, Ankara has expected to constrain its whether the pact constrains subsidence, snow/ice plans to generate hydropower include both ends of South problem. These do not Following the bilateral consistently supported military options under the India’s choices following a avalanches, flash floods, from the Brahmaputra basin Asia. Malaysia, despite being amount to being at risk of war defence agreement with Pakistan, politically and pact. Saudi Arabia and the cross-border terrorist attack. violent and sudden glacial lake by 2047 through a network of outburst floods (GLOFs), slow- 208 dams, including the Mammootty at 75: An extraordinary actor who outli [Showing first 8,000 characters — download PDF for full document]