Pendency of Litigation(s)/dispute(s) or the outcome impacting the Company

Date: 08th September, 2026 To To The General Manager The Listing Department Department of Corporate Services National Stock Exchange of India Limited BSE Ltd, Exchange Plaza, P. J. Towers, Dalal Street, Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai – 400 001 Mumbai – 400 051 Scrip code: 532407 Scrip Symbol: MOSCHIP Dear Sir/Madam, Sub: Update on the earlier intimation submitted on Order from Hon’ble Supreme Court under Regulation 30 of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 Further to our earlier disclosures submitted to the Stock Exchanges on 12th May, 2026 and 02nd September, 2026, we hereby submit the enclosed revised disclosure incorporating the clarifications received from the Company's legal counsel regarding the Hon'ble Supreme Court's Order dated 01st September 2026. The enclosed revised disclosure required for a material event under Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, read with SEBI Master Circular No. HO/49/14/14(7)2025-CFD-POD2/I/3762/2026 dated January 30, 2026, is enclosed herewith as “Annexure – Kindly take the above information on your records. Thanking you, Yours faithfully, For MosChip Technologies Limited, CS Suresh Bachalakura Company Secretary MosChip Technologies Limited 7th Floor, My Home Twitza, TSIIC Knowledge City, Hyderabad, Telangana - 500081, India Tel: +91 40 6622 9292, www.MosChip.Com, CIN: L31909TG1999PLC032184 Annexure A Disclosure under Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 read with SEBI Master Circular No. HO/49/14/14(7)2025-CFD-POD2/I/3762/2026 dated January 30, 2026 i) Name of the Authority: Hon’ble Supreme Court of India ii) Nature of Details and Action(s) The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, in proceedings arising out of a dispute taken, initiated or order(s) passed: between Ras Al Khaimah Investment Authority and certain persons and entities connected with the promoters of the Company, had by its interim order dated May 11, 2026 directed maintenance of status quo in relation to the proposed acquisition of 73% of the equity share capital of Vayavya Labs Private Limited ("VLPL") by the Company. The Company has no connection with the underlying dispute till date. The Company had filed an Impleadment Application seeking appropriate relief in relation to the proposed acquisition of VLPL. The Hon'ble Supreme Court allowed the Company's impleadment application and heard the matter. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has pronounced its judgment on September 1, 2026. Pursuant to the said judgment, the respondents have been directed to furnish an additional security of ₹200 crore jointly and severally by all respondents involved in the said proceedings before 15th September, 2026. As per para. 71 of the Hon’ble Supreme Court’s order dated 01st September 2026 which is extracted and given below; “Considering the above, as a matter of prudence and in keeping with the sequence of events, the Status Quo Order passed by this Court ought not to be vacated without the furnishing of appropriate security. The Appellant has shown sufficient cause for the imposition of furnishing of additional security by the Respondents. Therefore, we deem it appropriate to modify the status quo orders, subject to the Judgment Debtor furnishing additional security as directed below pending final satisfaction of the decree.” iii) Date of receipt of direction or September 1, 2026 order, including any ad-interim or interim orders, or any other communication from the authority: iv) Details of the violation(s) / No violation(s) / contravention(s) committed or alleged to be committed. contravention(s) committed or alleged to be committed: v) Impact on financial, operation or other activities of the listed As per para. 71 of the Hon’ble Supreme Court’s order dated 01st September 2026 which is extracted and given below; entity, quantifiable in monetary terms to the extent possible: “Considering the above, as a matter of prudence and in keeping with the sequence of events, the Status Quo Order passed by this Court ought not to be vacated without the furnishing of appropriate security. The Appellant has shown sufficient cause for the imposition of furnishing of additional security by the Respondents. Therefore, we deem it appropriate to modify the status quo orders, subject to the Judgment Debtor furnishing additional security as directed below pending final satisfaction of the decree.” The Company has been informed that the additional security amount directed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court is proposed to be taken care of by the judgement debtor. Accordingly, the said direction does not have any financial, operational, or other impact on the Company. The Company shall make further disclosures, if required, in accordance with applicable laws and regulations in this regard.